PRINCIPLES
Our measure is not how much AI can say, but whether a claim has support, whether it crosses a boundary and whether judgment still belongs to the person.
01 · A NAME BECOMES A METHOD
Kun means holding complexity without rushing to label it. Gen means recognising limits to both capability and authority. Asking keeps evidence and uncertainty in the conversation. Tao returns understanding to life as it is lived.
02 · A MIRROR, NOT A HAMMER
Neither a chart nor AI has the authority to deliver a final verdict on a person. A useful interpretation reveals tendencies, timing, source context and room for change without creating dependence on the answer.
03 · CLAIM—EVIDENCE—BOUNDARY
The more specific a capability claim becomes, the more visible its support and boundary should be.
State the capability in specific, limited language.
Point to the current implementation, tests, real interface or a public source.
State uncertainty, data flow, scope and what the product cannot replace.
04 · FIVE PRODUCT DISCIPLINES
These disciplines are not tonal adjustments. They shape when the product answers, how it answers and when it stops.
No disaster, lifespan or disease claims designed to create dependence.
No diagnosis, prescriptions, therapy, legal opinions or investment instructions.
Relationship questions return to communication, evidence and the people involved.
No promises to avert misfortune or change luck, and no purchase pressure built on fear.
Cultural interpretation is never presented as modern scientific validation or product technology.
05 · RETURN THE CHOICE
If an interpretation only makes a person more dependent on interpretation, it has not done its work. We want people to leave the screen better able to check the facts, hear themselves and decide what to discuss, verify or do next in the real world.
If an interpretation only makes a person more dependent on interpretation, it has not done its work.
